okla.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Oklahoma... we're trying ya'll

Administered by:

Server stats:

33
active users

#academic

3 posts3 participants0 posts today

Colleague just got a clearly AI-written peer review. Citing non-existent papers and scolding her for the mistakes which aren't to be found in the manuscript.

I wonder what would be a good line of action? Shouldn't be citing a non-existent papers by a reviewer a reason for referee recusal and banning from #PeerReview at least at this publisher?

Replied in thread

@Techmeme This is the danger of closed source

These are knowledge models, and they only output what they are fed with

And no, they won’t magically develop ’reasoning skills’ and be able to sift through propaganda. NOT when it’s part of the training

To think otherwise means you don’t know shit how they work

They obey statistics. Training data for #ai #foundationmodels should be subject to public #academic scrutiny. Otherwise the models are bound to fall for flooding attacks

Universities must resist the fascist coup that is being perpetrated by the US regime. What they seem to be doing instead is capitulate without a fight. Here's what I wrote to my university's president the other day (fwiw), in response to his reassurance that "Cornell follows the law".

@SRTurtleIsland @brembs @ProPublica @holocaustmuseum @mastodonmigration @timothysnyder_ @breadandcircuses #university #uspolitics #fascism #resist #law #academic

Hcommons.social is a Hometown Mastodon server for humanities scholars and practitioners around the world:

:Fediverse: hcommons.social

This server has additional features including much longer post lengths and local server-only post visibility options.

You can find out more about hcommons.social at hcommons.social/about or contact the admin @hello

Hometown hosted on hcommons.socialhcommons.socialhcommons.social is a microblogging network supporting scholars and practitioners across the humanities and around the world.

I just discovered the existence of the #academic journal Frontiers for Young Minds, which invites researchers to submit a simplified version of their work at a level appropriate for a child to read and understand, and which includes children as reviewers for each article. I love this idea so much. A quick look at the articles suggests that they're doing a great job of balancing simple language and presentation while respecting that children can understand complex ideas if explained properly.

I would have loved this when I was a kid.

kids.frontiersin.org

Frontiers for Young MindsFrontiers for Young MindsFrontiers for Young Minds is an open-access scientific journal written by scientists and reviewed by a board of kids and teens.

"Donald #Trump on Monday said he had ordered the firings of the boards of visitors for all of the #US military’s service academies, the outside advisory panels that help oversee #academic programs and student life...

The #purge has begun to extend to the nation’s service academies... the US #Defense Department had begun restricting access to some #books in its school systems."
politico.com/news/2025/02/10/t

Small #academic story: once a year our PhD students give a talk and receive a collection of anonymous feedback from professors who attended their talk.
My wife (also colleague here) told me one review of his PhD student was particularly rude, with complaints about answers to questions taking too long and the that the talk has only technical and no scientific content.
To which I replied: "oh, that's my report!" 🙄

Then....